Effect of Technology on Private Life
Technology is widely used nowadays. There is a very
small place to affect the development process of technology. Hoven says a new
technological product could change the direction of technology development. The
technological tools we use now can become very obsolete after a few years. It
is not possible to reach the speed of technology. In a few seconds, a higher
model of each product is produced. Hoven mentions about the advantages of
technology and offers us the opportunity to monitor and follow every kind of
technological products, from the technological devices in our house to the tools
we own. In other words, we can reach all our technological devices which are
connected with technological devices. This technology is a great advantage for
people. Hoven discusses this because
there is also somebody else the possibility of accessing and monitoring this
technological device. Hoven says that this can be a great disadvantage for us
and that it will jeopardize our privacy. Hoven argues about the possibility that
the personal lives and personal information of people can be seized by cyber
hackers, increasing as the technology advances.
Privacy is a very important part of human life. Today,
we see that we have reached the level of nanotechnology in technological
development. In our time, nanotechnology is perhaps the highest level of
technology. Nano technology, integrated circuits, logistics, stores,
non-staining dresses, hidden cameras, listening instruments, security systems
have started to show activity in many different fields. However, the
confidentiality of personal data is in danger. Nanotechnology, sub-micron and
nano electronics has the privacy field. In other words, nano-technological
devices store people's personal data in a confidential database and this
informations don’t disappear anytime. However, the design of nano technology is
not done by taking into consideration the privacy of the personal data of the
people. It is designed and manufactured considering the technological purpose. However,
the fact that people have personal data on someone else brings serious
disadvantages to individuals. This is the main point of Hoven's article. For
example, the protection of personal information reduces the likelihood of
people being harmed in a manner similar to restricting access to fire, rather
than in the open. Similarly, weapons reduce the likelihood of people being
struck in the street. If we do not establish a legal regime that restricts
citizens' access to weapons, we know that there is a chance that innocent
people might be hit. So we have to close the road where danger is reached.
We share our personal information most of the time in
internet. A person who can access this information can market it to someone
else like a vendor. This can lead to our bank information, our personal
information, our health security number, and many other confidential
information. One who has our knowledge can create a very negative situation for
us. Today, people sign confidentiality agreements in many areas. However, since
they do not read the contents of the contracts much, they do not know what
their personal data is. Therefore, data protection laws should take more rigid
implications in terms of equality and protection of personal data. In addition,
this situation requires marketing companies to use the personal data of other
persons as a means of marketing, and require personal data to be addressed in a
situation where more protection is required. Hoven says, Technology is both our
friend and your enemy and that knowing this, Hoven says that we should act
accordingly. People are very interested in technological advances. They want to have a
newly produced technological product immediately. But this technological
curiosity jeopardizes the safety of their personal information. There is a risk
that the confidential information they have will be stolen. Without taking
these risks and dangers, people continue to share their personal data on
technological devices. We do not know who uses the personal data and for what
purpose. Hoven states that laws must be more deterrent for the protection of
personal and private information, and that the privacy of people is in need of
further protection. Hoven mentions that organizations, individuals or companies
that have information must be more protective and careful in the event that
personal information may fall into the hands of bad intention people.
I think privacy
is very important for people. The information that people only have on their
own is the special information. Knowing this particular information by someone
else can put a person's private life in danger. If someone likes to examine
people's windows, it is a very objectionable situation for their knowledge of
the person examined. They can have bank information, social security number and
many personal information about the person being examined. If this information
is used, that person may have many problems, both material and spiritual.
Therefore, the examination and investigation of a person's secret life without
showing any respect, I think according to the law must be a big crime. I think
it is wrong to examine their private life and knowledge of other people
personal data. I believe that respect for people's private lives should be
respected.
Written by Erdogan Akbiyik
http://erdoganakbiyik.blogspot.com/
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDsUnmBfVdEPkcC8FlzPKcg
No comments:
Post a Comment